Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10996
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEbo, O. O.-
dc.contributor.authorOlugbenga, A. G.-
dc.contributor.authorAtainyang, P. O.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-22T13:14:37Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-22T13:14:37Z-
dc.date.issued2018-08-
dc.identifier.citation15. O. O. Ebo, A. G. Olugbenga and P. O. Atainyang, Economic Viability Of Using Bioethanol As An Additive To Target High Quality Unleaded Motor Gasoline Production In A Nigeria Refinery, ABU NEC2018 085- Book of Proceedings, National Emgineering Conference August 21018, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Facaulty of Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10996-
dc.descriptionThe aim of this research is to estimate the optimum production rates (quality and quantity) and was achieved by formulating an objective function and minimizing it for the minimum cost of blend from which the final product is made. The objective function was explored in three areas which include effect of bioethanol price changes, effect of changing percentage of bioethanol added to the gasoline and Possible production rates that can be obtained from the same pool. Production of high quality unleaded gasoline using bioethanol as an additive is of immense importance because they reduce the emission of contaminating gases produced from combustion of gasoline mainly, carbon monoxide (CO) and gaseous hydrocarbons (HC). It also improves the octane rating by decreasing the gasoline tendency to knocken_US
dc.description.abstractThe study was aimed at estimating the optimum production rate of gasoline (quality and quantity). This was achieved by formulating and minimizing an objective function for the minimum cost of blend using linear programming technique on MATLAB R2015a. The objective function was explored in three areas; effects of bioethanol price changes, changing the percentage of bioethanol added to the gasoline, and possible production rate that can be obtained from the same pool. The Prices (N/bbl), amounts (bbl/day), RON and RVP of all the gasoline pool components (FCC Gasoline, Reformate and Light Naphtha) for the blend to produce 15000 bbl/d of Gasoline with RON of 90 and RVP of 9 psi max were obtained from KRPC. These data were simulated and gave an optimum cost of 23,783N/bbl. To obtain 15000 bbl/d of unleaded Premium Gasoline with RON of 93 and RVP of (8 min-9 max) psi, these data were simulated with Bioethanol (RON 109, RVP 2 and 5% min -10% max) as an additive and it gave 25,796 N/bbl as the optimum cost. The effect of bioethanol price changes revealed that lower prices of bioethanol below actual price of 55,650 N/bbl gave optimum costs below 25,796 N/bbl, while the higher prices above the actual price gave optimum costs above 25,796 N/bbl. The study of bioethanol percentage changes between 3% and 15% showed that 3% and 4% gave lower optimum cost below 25,796 N/bbl, while 6 to 10% gave higher cost above 25,796 N/bbl. The study of production rate of 11000 bbl/d to 17000 bbl/d gave the same optimum cost of 25,796 N/bbl. Bioethanol addition of 12% to 15% and Production rate of 18000 bbl/d to 20000 bbl/d could not be achieved due to unavailability of FCC Gasolineen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipselfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Engineering Ahmadu Bello Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesABU NEC 2018 085;-
dc.subjectFCC Gasoline, Bioethanol, Reformate, Light Naphtha Simulation, MATLABen_US
dc.titleECONOMIC VIABILITY OF USING BIOETHANOL AS AN ADDITIVE TO TARGET HIGH QUALITY UNLEADED MOTOR GASOLINE PRODUCTION IN A NIGERIA REFINERYen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Chemical Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ABU NEC2018 085.pdf478 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.