Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1249
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTijani, Jimoh Oladejo-
dc.contributor.authorNdamitso, Muhammed Muhammed-
dc.contributor.authorAbdulkareem, Ambali Saka-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T15:32:05Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-04T15:32:05Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-22-
dc.identifier.citationMustapha S, Tijani JO, Ndamitso MM, Abdulkareem AS, Shuaib DT, & Mohammed AK (2021). A critical review on geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol in water: sources, effects, detection, and removal techniques. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193, 204en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-08980-9-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1249-
dc.description.abstractThe exposure to geosmin (GSM) and 2-methylisoborneol (2-MIB) in water has caused a negative impact on product reputation and customer distrust. The occurrence of these compounds and their metabolites during drinking water treatment processes has caused different health challenges. Conventional treatment techniques such as coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and chlorination employed in removing these two commonest taste and odor compounds (GSM and 2-MIB) were found to be ineffective and inherent shortcomings. The removal of GSM and MIB were found to be effective using combination of activated carbon and ozonation; however, high treatment cost associated with ozonation technique and poor regeneration efficiency of activated carbon constitute serious setback to the combined system. Other shortcoming of the activated carbon adsorption and ozonation include low adsorption efficiency due to the presence of natural organic matter and humic acid. In light of this background, the review is focused on the sources, effects, environmental pathways, detection, and removal techniques of 2-MIB and GSM from aqueous media. Although advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) were found to be promising to remove the two compounds from water but accompanied with different challenges. Herein, to fill the knowledge gap analysis on these algal metabolites (GSM and 2-MIB), the integration of treatment processes vis-a-viz combination of one or more AOPs with other conventional methods are considered logical to remove these odorous compounds and hence could improve overall water quality.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) of Nigeria under grant number TETFUND/FUTMINNA/2017/01en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193, 204en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries193;204-
dc.subjectGeosmin · 2-Methylisoborneol · Conventional treatment techniques · Advanced oxidation processes · Water qualityen_US
dc.titleA critical review on geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol in water: sources, effects, detection, and removal techniquesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Chemistry

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mustapha2021_Article_ACriticalReviewOnGeosminAnd2-m.pdf1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.