Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/17062
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMusa, Sokodabo Hajara-
dc.contributor.authorYakubu, Yisa-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T12:19:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-12T12:19:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationMusa Sokodabo Hajara and Yakubu Y. β€œEffects of one missing observation in central composite designs (CCDs) on estimates of model parameters and their standard errors”. A Paper Presented at the 3rd School of Physical Sciences Biennial International Conference (SPSBIC) 2021, held from 25th – 28th October, 2021, at the Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/17062-
dc.description.abstractWe may be confronted with a situation in which some observations are lost or unavailable due to some accident or cost constraints and their absence has a very bad impact on the estimates of the regression coefficients. This work investigates the effect of one missing observation of different types of design points on the estimated model for the candidate central composite designs considered. Three different Central Composite Designs (CCD) were studied in this work, which include the 2-factor, 3-factor and the 4-factor CCDs. The regression coefficients and their standard errors were first studied for the full designs and then, similar results were investigated separately for one factorial point missing, one axial point missing and one centre point missing for each of the designs considered. It was observed that missing observations of each of the design points have adverse effect on the regression estimates and standard errors of the model parameters of each of the designs considered. For the 2-factor CCD, the quadratic effect (π‘₯1 2 ) for factor one was observed to be the largest but negative on the yield for the full design (𝛽̂ = βˆ’0.806), while that of factor two (π‘₯2 2 ) was the smallest on the yield (𝛽̂ = 0.069) after the cross-product (π‘₯1π‘₯2 ) effect (𝛽̂ = 0.150). The standard errors of each of these two quadratic effects are the highest (𝑆𝐸 π‘π‘œπ‘’π‘“ = 0.505) after that of the cross-product effect (𝑆𝐸 π‘π‘œπ‘’π‘“ = 0.639).For the 3-factor CCD, it was observed that the linear effects of π‘₯1and π‘₯3 are the most significant linear effects while the quadratic effects of π‘₯2 and π‘₯3 are the most significant quadratic effects in the case of the full design. When a factorial run is missing, the estimated effect of each of the model parameters remain almost unchanged, indicating that the factorial point looks less influential for the regression estimates for this design. However, the standard error of each of these effects become higher with the linear, quadratic, and cross-product effects behaving similarly for the missing factorial run in this design.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNILLen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSchool of Physical Sciences Biennial International Conference (SPSBIC) 2021, Federal University of Technology, Minnaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries;429-442-
dc.subjectMissing observations, Estimates of model parameters, Standard errors, Central composite designen_US
dc.titleEffects of one missing observation in central composite designs (CCDs) on estimates of model parameters and their standard errorsen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
Appears in Collections:Statistics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SPSBIC Proceedings 2021.pdf28.85 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.