Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://ir.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/597
Title: | An Alternative Choice in Heighting. Geoinformatics FCE CTU (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague), 17(1), 45-60. doi:10.14311/gi.17.1.4 |
Authors: | Omogunloye, O. G Yaqub, M. O Ojegbile, B. M Odumosu, J. O Ajayi, Oluibukun Gbenga |
Issue Date: | 2018 |
Publisher: | Geoinformatics FCE CTU (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague) |
Abstract: | Comparison of orthometric heights obtained from the combination of GPS/Levelling survey method with that obtained from Light Detection Ranging (LIDAR), Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), and Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER GDEM) data is an area of research which is of great interest to Geomaticians. This area of research makes possible the discovery of other suitable methods of determining orthometric height which can be selected for use, depending on the region, extent and nature of the terrain where the project is to be executed. The X, Y, Z coordinates and the geoidal heights for all the existing controls within University of Lagos were determined using the GPS/ Levelling survey method, the required orthometric height (H) was then obtained as the differences between ellipsoidal and geoidal heights. Extracting orthometric heights for the X and Y coordinates of observed control points, overlaid on each of LIDAR, SRTM and ASTER GDEM, required the use of spatial analysis tool in an ArcMap environment. From the profile plot (Figure 8) of all the orthometric heights, the heights relationship was easily established. From the descriptive statistics test (Table 4), the one way ANOVA test at 1% and 5% level of significance (Table 7), the number of points in other methods whose orthometric height is closed to that of Levelling/GPS method (Table 6) and correlation test on the various orthometric heights obtained (Table 8), it is obvious that all the applied methods operates at different spatial resolutions. Of all the four methods, GPS/Levelling method, was the most reliable and most accurate method followed by LIDAR method, then by ASTER GDEM method and SRTM has the least. In a nutshell, orthometric heights generated by method of LIDAR are very close to that generated by GPS/Levelling method at several stations, thus method of LIDAR was considered as the most suitable alternative to GPS/Levelling method, whenever the use of the later method cannot be easily accomplished. |
Description: | Omogunloye, O. G., Yaqub, M. O., Ojegbile, B. M., Odumosu, J. O., and Ajayi, O. G. (2018). An Alternative Choice in Heighting. Geoinformatics FCE CTU (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague), 17(1), 45-60. doi:10.14311/gi.17.1.4 |
URI: | http://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/597 |
Appears in Collections: | Surveying & Geoinformatics |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
4778-12938-1-PB.pdf | Full paper | 2.67 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.