Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7008
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOlugbenga, A.G-
dc.contributor.authorAl-mhanna, N.M-
dc.contributor.authorYahya, Muibat Diekola-
dc.contributor.authorAfolabi, E.A-
dc.contributor.authorOla, M.K-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-07T09:49:47Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-07T09:49:47Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-10-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ pr9020327-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7008-
dc.description.abstractA three‐phase separator is the first vessel encountered by well fluids. The application of separators has been of great value to the oil and gas industry. In order to generate the gas phase envelope that is applicable to the study of reservoir fluid and the selection of optimum operating conditions of separators, this research utilizes a specified reservoir fluid stream to simulate a threephase separator executed in Aspen HYSYS. Subsequently, a comparative study of the effects of specified inlet operating conditions on the output of gas and oil streams was carried out. The results show that changing the inlet pressure of the separator from 1000 to 8000 kPa reduces the gas outlet flow from 1213 to 908.6 kg mol/h, while it increases the liquid flow rate from 374 to 838.0 kg mole/h. By changing the temperature of the separator feed stream from 13 to 83 °C, the gas outlet stream was raised from 707.4 to 1111 kg mol/h, while the liquid flow rate dropped from 1037.0 to 646.1 kg mol/h. It was observed that the concentration of the outlet methane product is not affected by changing the flow rate of the feed stream at a specific pressure and temperature. Therefore, the thermodynamic property method is appropriate to simulate the separation of reservoir fluids which was achieved by selecting the Peng–Robinson (PR) model. The operating conditions of the separator were at 8000 kPa and 43 °C, which lies right on the dew point line. This is comparable to similar work on CHEMCAD which was in turn validated by plant data. Thus, the gas flow rate and the oil flow rate were dependent on pressure and temperature conditions of the plant.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherProcessesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries;9, 327-
dc.subjectAspen HYSYS; separator; Peng–Robinson model; gas; oil; molar flowen_US
dc.titleValidation of the molar flow rates of oil and gas in three‐phase separators using aspen hysysen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Chemical Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
processes-09-00327.pdf502.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.